Marketing Email Articles

Alzheimer's Was Rare in Ancient History—Why Is the Risk So High Now?

Written by Princeton Integrative Health | Mar 20, 2025 12:00:00 AM

At Princeton Integrative Health, we understand that witnessing a loved one struggle with Alzheimer's disease—or facing it yourself—can be one of the most challenging experiences in life. The confusion, memory loss, and behavioral changes that accompany this condition are not just clinical symptoms; they deeply affect the lives of families and individuals.

But what if Alzheimer's, as we know it today, wasn't always a common occurrence? Recent research offers a fascinating perspective that could provide some hope for those dealing with this disease. By exploring ancient health records from Greece and Rome, researchers sought to discover whether Alzheimer's or similar conditions were prevalent in ancient times.

The findings were intriguing. Despite thorough investigations, mentions of severe memory loss, akin to what we now recognize as Alzheimer's, were surprisingly scarce. This suggests that in ancient times, significant cognitive decline was not a common aspect of aging. This revelation raises the question: could our modern lifestyle be a major contributor to the rise of Alzheimer's disease?

A Glimpse into the Past

Research conducted at USC indicates that while mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was recognized in ancient Greece, there was little to no documentation of severe memory loss affecting daily life. As time progressed into ancient Rome, where urbanization increased and the use of metals like lead became widespread, there were slight increases in reports of cognitive decline. Notable figures such as Galen and Pliny the Elder observed memory issues among the elderly, but even then, these cases were considered rare.

This historical context challenges the belief that age-related dementia is an inevitable part of aging. Instead, it suggests that the prevalence of Alzheimer's and similar conditions may be tied to factors unique to our modern era.

Learning from the Tsimane People

To further understand the impact of lifestyle on dementia risk, researchers looked to the Tsimane people of the Bolivian Amazon, a group that lives a preindustrial, highly active lifestyle. Remarkably, the Tsimane have an astonishingly low rate of dementia, offering a modern-day glimpse into how our ancestors might have aged.

This comparison underscores the significant role that environmental and lifestyle factors play in dementia risk. The stark contrast between the low dementia rates among the Tsimane and the high rates in modern society suggests that by making conscious changes to our lifestyle and environment, we might be able to reduce the risk of Alzheimer's.

A Call for a Healthier Future

This research not only deepens our understanding of Alzheimer's disease through the lens of history but also highlights the critical importance of our environment and lifestyle in shaping our health outcomes. By looking back at ancient civilizations and learning from the lifestyle of the Tsimane people, we are reminded that it is possible to influence the prevalence of dementia through proactive changes in how we live today.

At Princeton Integrative Health, we believe that by reevaluating the factors contributing to Alzheimer's and related dementias, we can inspire hope for a healthier future—one where this debilitating condition is no longer a foregone conclusion.

As we continue to explore and understand the complex interplay between our lifestyle, environment, and health, we encourage you to consult with your healthcare provider before making any changes to your diet, exercise routine, or supplement regimen.

This content is for informational purposes only and is not intended to replace professional medical advice. Please consult with a healthcare professional before making any health-related decisions.

 

References

  1. Creedon, Katie. “9 Common Causes of Dementia.” Rupa Health, 22 Apr. 2022, www.rupahealth.com/post/a-functional-medicine-approach-to-dementia.
     
  2. Finch, Caleb E., and Stanley M. Burstein. “Dementia in the Ancient Greco-Roman World Was Minimally Mentioned.” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, vol. Preprint, no. Preprint, 1 Jan. 2024, pp. 1–8, content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-disease/jad230993, https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-230993.
  3. Gatz, Margaret, et al. “Prevalence of Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Indigenous Bolivian Forager‐Horticulturalists.” Alzheimer’s & Dementia, vol. 19, no. 1, 9 Mar. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12626.
  4. Khakham, Chil. “An Integrative Medicine Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease: Testing, Nutrition, and Supplements.” Rupa Health, 23 May 2023, www.rupahealth.com/post/to-functional-medicine-labs-that-help-individualize-treatment-for-alzheimers-disease.
  5. Chil, Khakham. “Understanding Environmental Toxins and Their Impact on Health.” Rupa Health, 10 July 2023, www.rupahealth.com/post/understanding-environmental-toxins-and-their-impact-on-health.
  6. Medzerian, David. “Did the Ancient Greeks and Romans Experience Alzheimer’s?” USC Today, 31 Jan. 2024, https://today.usc.edu/alzheimers-in-history-did-the-ancient-greeks-and-romans-experience-dementia/.
  7. Peters, Annette. “Ambient Air Pollution and Alzheimer’s Disease: The Role of the Composition of Fine Particles.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 120, no. 3, 10 Jan. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2220028120.
  8. Ramírez Ortega, Daniela, et al. “Cognitive Impairment Induced by Lead Exposure during Lifespan: Mechanisms of Lead Neurotoxicity.” Toxics, vol. 9, no. 2, 28 Jan. 2021, p. 23, https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9020023.
  9. Shetty, Shilpa, et al. “Environmental Pollutants and Their Effects on Human Health.” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 9, 1 Sept. 2023, pp. e19496–e19496, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19496.
  10. Yan, Shijiao, et al. “Association between Sedentary Behavior and the Risk of Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Translational Psychiatry, vol. 10, no. 1, 21 Apr. 2020, www.nature.com/articles/s41398-020-0799-5, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0799-5.